Yeah, I'm a civilian, and personally I would never carry a gun cocked and locked unless I'm walking around Harlem with a pound of gold on. Both are great guns. Tough to beat a Beretta 92 as a suppressor host outside of pistols specifically designed around suppressor use. Compare the dimensions and specs of CZ 75 Compact and Beretta 92 FS Compact Personally i like the trigger (with a 92g spring) better on the 92. When I first got the Beretta, I really enjoyed it, but realized that I wasn't super impressed with it. This achieves a better frame-to-slide fit, which improves accuracy. Between the full size Beretta 92 and CZ-75, I prefer the Beretta. ARCHIVED; Posted: 2/28/2013 5:54:43 AM EST I'm assuming most of us prefer the Beretta, but why? Sig, CZ,and Beretta are all high quality handguns so you have to decide which is the most chosen one. The CZ fits my hands perfectly whereas the "Beretta" seems like a … Nearly every single pistol was capable of a group of less than 2 inches at 25 yards and less than 1 inch at 35 feet (11.7 yards). While I personally prefer the CZ-75 over the Beretta 92 (I have both), there are many folks who would champion the Beretta for many of the same reasons. And of the two, I connected to targets better with my full sized CZ 75 but that probably had to do with the fact that it was my gun that I have experience with. Really you should go fondle both and see which gun feels better to you. I've come to the conclusion that the choice between these two in particular is purely personal opinion. Does anybody know if the CZ 75s have had any well documented problems? It felt great in the hand. With regards to the CZ 75 I really can't comment too intelligently since I have never owned one. I like the Beretta better. Each have advantages, Beretta ultra-reliable, never jams if use all loads, much easier disassembly when clean it, fires wider variety of ammo. If a 410 can also shoot 45's, can a 28 gauge shoot 50 caliber? I say CZ-75. I like the CZ75B over the "Beretta" because I have small hands. Ummm? However, more and more law enforcement agencies are ditching it in favor of striker-fire Glocks and Sig Sauers. The sp01s come with a rail but the cz 75 can be had without. And IIRC MecGar makes 17 round flush fit mags for the Beretta as well as +2 extensions. It just doesn't seem worth it. Cant decide. So I'm already a few steps ahead of most people without having it cocked and locked. Beretta/Wilson Combat 92G Brigadier Tactical vs CZ Shadow 2. Get your answers by asking now. And speaking of striker fired guns.... since you are looking at a full size duty gun- (and both DA/SA) let me recommend the Turkish made Canik TP9 DA. Any feedback on the above listed guns? Compare the dimensions and specs of Beretta 92FS and CZ 75 B At 46.5 oz. Having said that, I shot a Beretta 92 very recently and it was extremely easy connecting to targets. 01-25-2017, 09:31 PM #12. Good magazine capacity. I carry with safety on and nothing in the chamber, and rack the slide if I think I might be walking into a bad situation. But it really is just a personal choice thing. Some revisions were made over the years, of course, and there are now a number of variants to be had besides the base 92FS model. I want this for range, match and just regular shooting. I believe the fit, finish, and feel of the CZ 75 is of higher quality than the Beretta 92. Decent factory sights. The Beretta 92 is not capable of the accuracy that the CZ is, not that you are buying this pistol for bullseye shooting, but hey. I'd say it's easy to see the preferred one is the CZ. The 92F is a pretty nice shooting, good qulaity and predictable 9mm. This Site Might Help You. I own a Beretta 92 Compact and a CZ 75 Compact. I have both. I am about to make a totally opinionated statement that is not based on any fact besides my personal observations. Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Satasaurus, Mar 31, 2013. Guns are different but the same. I love them both equally. CZ-75 vs Beretta 92? Like I said, if my life depended on a quick draw, then I'm probably a goner anyways. I have both. CZ may be a bit less expensive depending upon the model you would decide upon. I figure that if I'm in that bad of a situation where I have 1 second to fire a bullet, I'm probably a goner anyways. I am looking for a solid frame 9mm double stack DA/SA service pistol. I see what you mean, but I just don't feel comfortable potentially betting my life that the hammer isn't going to drop with a live round in the chamber. The Good:Reliable. As a unit armorer in the Army, and as a civilian, I have a lot of experience with the Beretta 92. Do you consider it safe to carry a striker fired handgun NO MANUAL SAFETY with a live round in the chamber ? Tactical models, compact versions for … I have owned and shot both (well, the 92 style was actually a Taurus 99 but I have also shot a real Beretta and it was no different). Try them both and go with the one YOU like better. CZ 75 - steel frame, frame mounted safety and the ability to carry cocked and locked, and a less bulky grip. I'm the "can't decide so get um all" kind of guy. I like Sigs, but I just don't want to spend the money. Both pistols are reliable. I'm pretty sure I held a Beretta 92 at a gun show a few years ago and it felt big in my hands, but I really want to hold them both and know once and for all. Beretta is much more accurate at DA, then SA, transition double taps because the sear break is at the identical point in trigger travel. Jump to Latest Follow ... Love both my Brig Tac and my CZ 75 Tactical Sport Orange (TSO). I have some experience with the Beretta M9 from shooting it in the military. Listed as the M9, it’s an extremely reliable Single Action/Double Action pistol with good magazine capacity and easy maintenance procedures. The CZ's ergonomics are better, IMO and the CZ is also a bit more accurate as well. It's looking that way, but like I said a few posts back, I think that has a lot to do with grip size. 0 0. I picked them both because I collect, but I prefer the grip of the CZ. Plus, CZs are very popular among both precision and IPSC shooters here in Germany, whereas I don't know anyone who has a Beretta. It's by far my favorite pistol, paired with a Kadet kit I bought as well. The Beretta 92, CZ 75 and Browning HP all have their shortcomings, but they certainly belong on my “best of” list, again for advancing the breed, but if you want to go historical, you might even have to include the “Red 9” Broomhandles along with the Luger and P-38 for bringing the 9 mm to the world’s attention. Those are two somewhat similar and very nice guns. The cz seems long and hard to me in double action. It is also very comfortable to shoot. They would have chosen the better one. The CZ has the most going for it in the line of options and accessories. Source(s): cz 75b beretta 92fs: https://tr.im/8eEMA. Every one I have shot has a cruddy trigger out of the box. If you were leaning toward a CZ to CCW, two of the strongest contenders are going to come down to the CZ 75 Compact vs PCR.CZ makes some of the best pistols to be had, though their product lineup is a bit heavier on the full-size guns than on concealed carry pistols. I prefer the CZ 75 for ergonomics. [ARCHIVED THREAD] - Beretta 92/M9 vs CZ-75. My CZ85's are noticeably more accurate than my Beretta 92's in single action shooting. CZ is a good weapon, but … So I've narrowed it down to a Beretta 92FS/M9 or CZ 75B. The CZ 75’s slide rides inside the frame rails. I haven't had enough trigger time on the Beretta to comment on its accuracy or reliabilty, but in terms of ergonomics, I prefer the CZs. how heavy does a bow have to have to pierce a human skull? Debating between a Beretta 92FS or CZ 75B - posted in Handguns: So I decided I still want a full-sized, metal-framed 9mm. Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. Striker fired guns I would place in a different category. I did not grow up on the Beretta; served 1971-1977 as an MP and carried the 1911A1 later, for awhile, as a cop. I have two CZ 75 variants and … Both fine weapons that I would not feel undergunned with. 5 years ago. Not so the CZ. Similar to the Beretta 92, the CZ 75 (and thus, the Shadow 2) has its own proprietary slide design. The Ugly:The pistol’s default grips are mediocre. Probably more personal choice, I would go with the Beretta, just my choice. CZ 75 Tactical Sport 9mm Pardini GT45-II 9mm Beretta 92 Combat 9mm Glock 17L 9mm (3rd gen) Results Based on the best group sizes, nearly all of the pistols performed well. I shoot the CZ more, but I love both of them. RE: cz 75b vs beretta 92fs? *Also the decocker on the CZ is much quieter than the Beretta. Also, a very comfortable gun in 9mm. Hunting: with the lead ban coming across Europe what will the 22 rimfire bullets be made from ? *I find the decocker/safety on the CZ less complicated and I don't think I've ever held a more comfortable hand gun. Maybe that fat grip distributes the recoil well, although the CZ is no slouch in that department, either. loaded. You should pick the one that fits your hand the best. Between the 92FS compact and CZ P01, I prefer the CZ. It was a bit thick as a conceal carry, and years later I picked up the CZ 75 Compact. The p-01 is a great size, has a rail and shoots very nice. What gives? Having owned both I would recommend the Beretta. I might take the Beretta, only because I have to qualify with one and teach others to qualify with one, but for use, I'd prefer the CZ. As much as I love Glocks, I would NEVER carry one with a bullet in the chamber. Just holding one and looking at it, the Beretta seems a LOT larger than the CZ-75. empty vs the Beretta's 36, it sounds like it could. My CZ was accurate and reliable but was not of the same build quality as the 92 series Beretta. If I invent a fish magnet that brings all the fish direct into my net, will I be rich ? EDIT: Another thing to consider is the magazine capacity. I don't carry any of them. Eventually, I'll get a Beretta. Even with a manual safety on I don't want a bullet in the chamber ... Is there a universal agreement between all criminals out there that if you are a civilian out side of Harlem they would give you time to draw and rack the slide that I somehow missed? Both are excellent guns. I have two CZ 75 variants and I can say that about both of them as well. It’s very barebones all around – but sturdy. They are among the most reliable and trouble-free handgun magazines I have ever used and hold up very well. I mean really, how many civilians have actually had their lives saved by having a gun cocked a locked? Sig Legion vs Wilson Combat Beretta 92 VS CZ 75 Shadow 2 - posted in Gear: I really have a hankering for a new blaster. They may be comparable in durability, but that is not the only characteristic to consider when choosing a handgun. In fact, when the CZ-75B first hit the US, Fobus sold their Beretta 92 holster as their CZ holster; they later relabeled it, but I couldn't see any real differences. I know the saying "if you haven't hit them in 15 shots, you won't hit them with one more" but I'd rather have that extra shot available if my life is riding on the outcome. I would place the Sig, CZ, Beretta, on top of all other handguns......BUT....IMO the 92 is still above all other handguns in that size/class. The 92 used to have problems with the locking block cracking but that issue was resolved years ago. And it was softer shooting. Hunting: is the 280 Ross safe to shoot as I heard that the bolt can shoot out into your face . I've … Most pistols have slides that fit over and ride outside of the frame’s rails. Standard Beretta magazines hold 15 rounds, standard magazines for the CZ hold 16. This isnt a … I think of the two, the Beretta had slightly less recoil. I owned a CZ-75B, and while it wasn't a bad gun, I have some reasons as to why I prefer the Beretta 92/M9 over the CZ series. You're talking like 3 1/2 lbs. The CZ feels great, but for some reason, even as bulky as the 92 feels in the hand, it points for me like pointing my finger. There's just something about the way the Beretta feels in the hand. I figure that most people don't even have a gun, let alone carry one every day. I have a question for you all. It felt great in the hand. The answer of this question is very subjective. *The Beretta is easier to take down to clean is really the only advantage to me. Both are very good guns. 0 0? Double/single action striker fired gun, with a 4.1" bbl and a 18 round mag....excellent da/sa trigger out of the box w/ de-cocker for about $375. Hi all! I won't be carrying it, but carrying my G19. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. In terms of durability, I suspect that the CZs' steel frame is superior to the Beretta's aluminum frame. Nor did it seem to balance as well for me. Does it feel too heavy? Has anyone else experienced this when handling and firing a Beretta 92 series? Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. I own several of each. The P-01 came in a steel version [99021 & 99041] that shoots even better, and if you absolutely don't care about the rail then the 75 compact [91190] is steel and is an excellent choice. But the CZ 75 (full size) shoots better. Cz 75 Vs Beretta 92. The Bad:Tri… yeah..I'd go with the Beretta 92 as well. Beretta slide is easier to grasp and control with wet, slimey, or cold hands. You can sign in to vote the answer. The Beretta 92 is the standard sidearm for most conventional U.S. military forces. It's a GREAT handgun, but it isn't quite the handgun that the CZ 75 is. And it was softer shooting. CZ-75 most accurate when use best loads, better at quick draw, fit my hand better. CZ 75 and 92fs Inox. But I picked up a Beretta, and it was easy as point and shoot. Having said that, I shot a Beretta 92 very recently and it was extremely easy connecting to targets. ... ive shot both in idpa competitions and id personally take the CZ any day over the 92. might be my military background but i hate the 92. Why it might be a 'mistake' to file your 2020 taxes now, Emotional moment during Trump impeachment speech, NFL player helps raise $350K for girl injured in Reid crash, Geraldo Rivera insists Trump is 'guilty as charged', Claudia Conway set to appear on 'American Idol', CDC pleads with Americans to 'avoid travel', Grandfather sentenced in child's cruise ship death, Eli Lilly chief quits due to 'inappropriate' relationship, Mahomes will have surgery for turf toe injury, A few vaccine recipients get rare blood disorder, 'QAnon Shaman': I'm 'deeply disappointed' in Trump. The same is true of the CZ 75, of course, but you can get a Beretta 92 to fit multiple tastes. My experience with either Beretta factory-branded magazines, or Mec-gar magazines for the 92FS have been excellent. Clash Of The Compact CZs: CZ 75D PCR vs CZ 75 Compact. The military pistol. Anonymous. Still have questions? I own a CZ 75 SP-01, and I've shot both the CZ 75B and the Beretta M9 a couple of times. I do like the gun but my experiences have been qualifying with it a few times and that's about it. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. 1) I disliked the fact that my model had no decocker. Source(s): https://shrinke.im/a70cM. I believe the fit, finish, and feel of the CZ 75 is of higher quality than the Beretta 92. How do you think about the answers? Im looking to buy a 9mm and ive narrowed it down to either a Cz 75b or a Beretta 92fs which one is better and why? Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages. I have both: CZ 75 SP-01 and a Beretta 92 Brigadier. The CZ is the winner all way around. The 92a1 and m9a1 also incorporate a rail so if you are wanting to mount accessories it might be worth it to look into those model over the standard 92fs. http://www.ignatius-piazza-front-si...ights-monday-blog-why-you-carry-a-loaded-gun/. And the CZ is light, fast, and sits low in the hand. But as mentioned, Matthew or Angus can make it sweet. M9a3 is also a tank, and a combat proven platform that’s had 30 years of end user gripes addressed in the latest iteration. CZ 75 SP-01 vs. Beretta 92FS.